March 23, 2016

The Unexpectedly High Expected Return of Global Equities

It seems just about everyone I talk to these days is underwhelmed by the long-term expected return of the global stock market. I, too, am more worried than normal about owning equities. However, my defensiveness arises from their negative momentum, not their valuation, which I see as surprisingly attractive.

The valuation picture is blurred by the dramatic divergence between US and non-US equities. For the past four-and-a-half years, the US equity market has outpaced non-US equities by more than 10% a year. After that relative outperformance, US equities do appear overvalued, but the attractive valuation of non-US markets more than compensates in a global portfolio.

The table below shows the cyclically adjusted earnings yields (using the past ten years of earnings) of each regional equity market. The Baseline regional weights I’m using fall in between the weights published by MSCI and those calculated by Bloomberg using their WCAP function.1

The earnings yield of the global equity market is 6.6%. To get to an estimate of the long-term expected real return, I assume that 60% of earnings can be paid out in dividends (besides sounding like a reasonable assumption, it also happens to be the average payout ratio from 1915 to 2015 in the US) which will grow at about 1.5% above inflation in the long term. Many observers prefer the even simpler estimate of just using the earnings yield itself, which is 6.6% - but I prefer basing the estimate on cash flow to investors, which is generally more conservative.

This results in 5.5% for the long-term expected real return for global equities (6.6% * 0.6 + 1.5%).2

So, how attractive is a 5.5% expected return above inflation? Here are four perspectives to consider:

  • US equities returned 5.4% after inflation in the 50 years from 1965 to 2015, which many people view as having been a good time to be an equity investor (although not nearly as good as the 8.2% from 1915 to 1965).
  • The chart at the top shows that 5.5% is well above the average expected return of 4.5%. It is in the top decile of expected returns calculated this way since 1985, a period of time longer than the careers of 80% of the people currently employed in the finance industry.3 We expect the average expected return prior to 1985 would be higher, but we don’t have readily available non-US data to extend the chart further into the past.
  • By contrast, other assets, such as fixed income and real estate, are currently offering low expected real returns, in the bottom decile of expected returns over the past 30 years. It is difficult to come up with a simple prospective measure of expected real returns for alternatives such as hedge funds, but they certainly have been struggling recently to generate the attractive returns they produced in the 80s and 90s.
  • Caution: equities can get a lot cheaper, quickly. Just a month ago, global equities were more than 10% lower than they are now, in case we need any reminder. While 5.5% appears attractive as a long term expected real return, we need to keep in mind that we may see much higher expected returns than that in the future.

Bottom line:

Global equities are pretty attractively valued, and when they enter a period of positive momentum, we’ll probably see very healthy returns.

Notes

  1. MSCI bases its weights on strict investible market cap data, while Bloomberg bases theirs on unrestricted market cap. The Baseline weights used here go beyond market cap, using other economically relevant data to compute weights. See this note for details, and here for a further comparison of weighting schemes.
  2. Based on the belief that earnings and dividends will grow at less than the rate of real GDP growth due to various slippages. For a more detailed discussion, watch this video, and read this short note. Furthermore, if we think of this as the central case in the return distribution, and if we believe the long-term return is distributed relative symmetrically around this value, then there is a convexity adjustment that makes investing in equities even more attractive. A back-of-the-envelope illustration is to note that if we thought there were two equally likely long term (say 30 year) outcomes for the real return, of say 5.5% + 2% and 5.5% – 2%, we would see that the return associated with the expected value of equities would be 6.02%, or 0.52% higher than the 5.5% base case.
  3. From US BLS data, here.
X

Baseline Weights: The Baseline defines the strategy's 'average' asset allocation over a long period of time, and serves as the reference point for Long-Term and Trend deviations. The Baseline represents the asset-allocation that a prospective investor would choose were they seeking a static strategy. See here for more information about the Baseline construction methodology.

Target Weights:The target weights used in the periodic portfolio rebalancing. Portfolios may not be rebalanced exactly to target, as Elm's execution engine tries to find a parsimonious set of trades which get as close as possible to target weights while also minimizing transaction costs, tax costs, etc.

Target Weight Breakdown:

Expected Return Metric:

Risk Metric:

Disclaimer

Elm Partners’ Funds are available only to accredited investors. The content of this website and related materials are not intended to solicit investment, but rather to elicit discussion and exploration of better ways to invest. The contents of this website do not comprise an offering document. Neither historical simulations nor past return performance are necessarily indicative of future returns. Elm Partners Management LLC is an investment advisor registered with the SEC. Here are the most recent copies of our Form ADV Part 1, ADV Part 2A2B and Form CRS.

Fidelity Investments (“Fidelity”) is an independent company, unaffiliated with Elm Partners (“Elm”). Fidelity is a service provider to Elm. There is no form of legal partnership, agency affiliation, or similar relationship between your financial advisor and Fidelity, nor is such a relationship created or implied by the information herein. Fidelity has not been involved with the preparation of the content supplied by Elm and does not guarantee, or assume any responsibility for, its content. Fidelity Investments is a registered trademark of FMR LLC. Fidelity InstitutionalSM provides clearing, custody, and other brokerage services through National Financial Services LLC or Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Members NYSE, SIPC. 830247.3.0

Here is the most recent Version of our Privacy Policy

Have a great day!